Fatcow Icon
Obama’s “Executive Privilege”
Jun 24, 2012 | 1188 views | 5 5 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Editor,

This past Wednesday, Barrack Hussein Obama declared “Executive Privilege” in an apparent effort to prevent the truth from being exposed about his involvement in the death of a United States border patrol officer. This is just another of a long list of unconstitutional actions made by this amateur currently occupying the White House.

If you aren’t familiar with this subject, let me share a synopsis. In 2009, the Obama Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) agency purposely sold powerful firearms to Mexican drug cartels. They steered these cartels to purchase the firearms in Arizona and then required the firearms dealers to complete the sell even when the individuals seeking the firearms weren’t able to pass the background check. The Obama team knew these guns would end up being used in violent crimes in Mexico. The strategy was simply this, let the drug dealers use the guns, then call attention to the fact that these were “American guns” being used … then “blame” America for the increased gun violence and lack of gun control laws in our country.

The ultimate goal was to call for increased gun laws on the American citizens by using these violent acts in Mexico as evidence of how inefficient our present gun laws are. You may recall that co-conspirator, Hillary Clinton, made that exact claim in early 2009. She went on national television and stated that “90 percent of all gun violence in Mexico was being committed with American guns”. She was one of the early adopters and promoters in the propaganda machine and was in full spin mode until something very tragic happened … a Border Patrol officer was killed. On December 14, 2010 Border Patrol Agent, Brian Terry was tragically killed by one of these guns. Shortly thereafter, several ATF agents came forward and told members of Congress that they had been ordered by Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department to “stand down” and allow firearms to be illegally sold to the Mexican drug cartels.

In January 2011, Republican Senator Charles Grassley began a Congressional investigation into what happened and why. In March 2011, Obama gave a television interview where he said that he and Eric Holder had not authorized the gun running and had only found out about Fast and Furious when they heard about it on a television news story. Since that date, several documents have been uncovered which contradict Mr. Obama’s statements. Eric Holder has repeatedly refused to cooperate with the investigation committee until another Republican Senator Darrell Issa informed the Attorney General that he would be found in contempt if he continued to refuse to submit the documents the committee had subpoenaed.

So, Wednesday, President Obama made the claim of “Executive Privilege” to prevent the truth from being known. These are the kinds of criminals we now have running the Democrat party in America. Communists like Obama, Clinton and Holder should be put on trial for treason. They don’t care what the American people want. They believe we shouldn’t have guns and they are willing to have our own people killed so long as they can advance their Socialist Democrat agenda. They are a disgrace to our heritage and our way of life and in my opinion so is anyone who supports them.

Gary Lee Corns

Logan



Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
AlexT
|
July 18, 2012
In fact, there was no difference between Wide Receiver and Fast and Furious accept scale. Wide Receiver lost about 450 guns, Fast and Furious lost about 1300 guns. In both cases they were supposed to coordinate with Mexico, in both cases, it never happened.

At the time, under the Bush administration Department of Justice (DOJ), no arrests or indictments were made. After President Barack Obama took office in 2009, the DOJ reviewed Wide Receiver in September 2009[26] and found that guns had been allowed into the hands of suspected gun traffickers. Indictments began in 2010, over three years after Wide Receiver concluded. As of October 4, 2011 (2011 -10-04)[update], nine people had been charged with making false statements in acquisition of firearms and illicit transfer, shipment or delivery of firearms. As of November, charges against one defendant had been dropped; five of them had pled guilty, and one had been sentenced to one year and one day in prison. Two of them remained fugitives.
AlexT
|
June 26, 2012
During an appearance on "Fox News Sunday," host Chris Wallace asked House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) whether he had "any evidence" that the White House had been involved in the Fast and Furious matter.

"No, we don't," Issa said. Issa further stated "I did not say that Eric Holder always knew."

Issa contradicted House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Sunday, saying that Congress has found no evidence that President Barack Obama or anyone at the White House had participated in a cover-up involving the Fast and Furious scandal.

Issa also acknowledged on the show that previous gun-walking cases occurred during the Bush administration, but said the practice went further under Obama.

On Thursday, Boehner said that the Obama administration's decision to invoke executive privilege to prevent the release of some documents about the program Issa had requested was "an admission that White House officials were involved in the decision that misled the Congress and covered up the truth."

Exating Executive Privilege in no way is an admission of guilt.

This is an out and out witchhunt.

Leebones
|
June 27, 2012
Alex T.: Great to see you back defending the undefensible again. Just the facts please. The Bush Administration program you refer to was called "Operation Wide Receiver" and was completely different from "Fast and Furious". Wide Receiver was a sting operation much like the bait cars used by numerous law enforcement agencies throughout our country. They "allowed" the guns to walk, FOLLOWED THEM and then arrested the law breakers. Obama, Clinton and Holder's plan was to let the guns walk, NOT TRACE THEM to the end buyers and then draw attention to the fact that they were showing up in crimes throughout Mexico and the US. The motive of the Bush team was to prevent the crimes from continuing. The motive of the Obama team was to demonstrate the weakness of America's lax gun laws. Bush's objective was to CUT OFF supply of guns by interdiction into the trade routes. Whereas Obama's objective was to OPEN the trade route and then blame America for its lack of gun regulation.

I call to witness, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, AG Eric Holder and BHO himself ALL KNOWING LIED, saying "90% of the drug guns in Mexico were coming from licensed American gun dealers" (a figure by the way which has been proven to be a pure fabrication. Mexico's own records show that that only 17% fell into this catagory). This alone is clear evidence of a conspiracy to mislead the American public in hopes of enflaming the general public to demand they tighten gun laws. THIS is what the evidence suggests and it is highly likely that the documents Holder is withholding might shed more light. No witch hunt, just the facts please.
DrPepperPHD
|
June 24, 2012
The truth will come out eventually. If all this is true, then Obama is pure evil. Good people know that the democrat party is in league with the devil. His executive privilege is being used to delay people from seeing that he was in on the whole thing. No one is blinder than he who will not see. Surely good people are starting to question Obama and his henchman, Eric Holder! Surely there are some good African American preachers out there who see something wrong with gay marriage!
cold_surfer
|
July 05, 2012
What I find sad is that this very excellent editorial is only in Logan and not front page of the NY time, LA times, Washington Post.

What I fail to understand is why the socialists are afraid of law abiding US citizens owning guns. Their insistence on stripping rights that so many of our ancestors gave life and well-being for us to have. Did their own ancestors not pay this price? Where their ancestors actually the ones our ancestors fought to gain these rights? Did their ancestors fight this battle in another land, lose the war and they retain a deep seated jealousy and hatred? Turn the clocks back 50, 100, 200, and 250 years and we might see the reasons why even more.

I spent the winter in London, and on my off-time, wondering why my ancestors left pretty often and visiting old family towns. We who left did fare better -- you might say we are now living in that promised land. If the English are honest with themselves, they too wish to be free Americans, yet they are bonded into socialized systems that fix their loyalty. I take every Brit I can to a gun range when they visit, just to give them a taste of freedom. about half of them have come back here to stay and realize this is the promised land. Let's not go back into bondage people !!!

Tony Dickens

SAR qualified

Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: