Fatcow Icon
Obama crossed the line
Dec 26, 2010 | 12236 views | 34 34 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Editor,

This week, the Obama White House crossed the line of free speech as no other President in the history of these United States. Tuesday, the FCC approved new rules to give the federal government formal authority to regulate Internet traffic. This action is clearly an attack on our First Amendment right free speech in America.

Democrats all across this nation saw the results from the last election and realized that their pro-Communist agenda cannot win in the arena of ideas (except in West Virginia where we vote based on our dead grandparents opinion). So, they’ve decided to tip the scales in their favor by reaching out to control the internet. By doing this, they can determine who gets to speak, what they say, where they say it, when they say it and to whom they say it. Basically, they want totalitarian control over our most basic freedom, our opinion. Sadly, our esteemed Senator Jay Rockefeller appears to be in complete agreement with this position. Please allow me to quote the Senator from earlier this month; "There's a little bug inside of me which wants to get the FCC to say to FOX and to MSNBC: 'Out. Off. End. Goodbye.' It would be a big favor to political discourse; our ability to do our work here in Congress, and to the American people, to be able to talk with each other and have some faith in their government and more importantly, in their future."

The Senator’s position here can only be one of two things; either he is saying we the people are too stupid to ferret out the truth when it comes to political debate or we should simply learn to trust our government leaders and avoid political debate altogether. These are the only two positions the good Senator can be taking here. Both would make Thomas Jefferson turn over in his grave!

If we were truly concerned about the constitutional positions of our elected officials, we could look back at their previous actions and comments to see if there is a pattern of un-American beliefs. Well, as it turns out Jay has voiced his opposition to free speech previously. In 2009, the Senator, speaking as Senate Transportation Committee Chairman, posed the question of whether we should have allowed the internet to have been developed at all! Of course, his musings were disguised behind the fears of cyber attacks. But, apparently Jay doesn’t understand that all freedoms are by nature subject to attack. This is why they must always be vigorously defended.

Nevertheless, it appears that Mr. Rockefeller prefers to ration freedoms to the rest of us as he and his fellow enlightened elites deem we should have them. But, don’t let that upset you; he’s a Democrat, and that alone makes him worthy of reelection! Don’t worry about those new FEMA camps, or those micro-chip implants in your cell phones, or those pesky new gun laws they want.  Democrats like Obama and Rockefeller are for the little guy. They will watch over your every need. All you need to do is trust them … all the way to the internment camp!

Gary Lee Corns

Logan
Comments
(34)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
jack_4ral
|
January 17, 2011
Rose, you sound like a 180 degree tea drinker.

Back in the 60's it was, there should never have been a Catholic voted into office.

Was that you that said that?

In my case, I would vote for a Yellow Dog before I would vote for a Republican.
bitter_kold
|
January 15, 2011
The President doesn't put his long-form birth certificate online for the same reason that other presidents haven't (to my knowledge). Or for the same reason that you and I don't put such pertinent information out on the world wide web. With yours or my information, unscrupulous people would just muck up our lives financially, personally, and maybe even mess up our legal reputations. I mean imagine if someone ordered something illegal in our name.

Now imagine what could be done in the name of the our Commander-in-chief's name. The President of the United States of America can send orders directly to our military and those orders be obeyed.

With our information, relatively few people would be affected. With the President's information in the wrong hands, nations could be affected. The entire United States could be affected. Personally, I don't want a terrorist wanna-be to have that kind of power and influence.

Besides, with all the conspiracy theorists stirring up all the paranoia out there, the long-form could be posted, but a couple days later, I am sure that someone could and would say that it was just a forged document and we all would be back at square 1 in the "conspiracy saga". Some people would argue a black sheep was white even if that sheep was right in front of them and there would be nothing you and I could do to change that person's mind about it.

Check these newspapers out; Honolulu Advertiser or the Honolulu Star-Bulletin for the week of August 4, 1961. In one of their editions for that week is a birth announcement for Pres. Obama. The newspaper will only print such an announcement when they receive that information from that state's department of health. That is not likely to be an easy fake since it was in 1961 and the family of President Obama had no influence on the matter. You would have to propose that this "conspiracy" started at President Obama's birth and given the racist atmosphere of the 1960's, I am sure a half-black baby would have been predicted to become president. I have an active imagination, but I can't even go that far.
roseharleymama
|
January 15, 2011
WHY ARE THE PEOPLE IN WEST VIRGINIA CRYING NOW?

MOST OF THE VOTES FOR OBAMA CAME FROM WEST VIRGINIA, YOU KNEW WHAT HE STOOD FOR AND STILL PUT HIM IN.

YES WVA IS A DEMOCRATIC STATE BUT PUTTING HIM IN WAS THE BIGGEST MISTAKE YOU HAVE EVER MADE.

THERE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN A BLACK VOTED INTO

OFFICE THANKS TO YOU ALL SOME OF US CAN'T EVEN MAINTAIN HEATLH CARE
jack_4ral
|
January 09, 2011
The same reason the FCC regulates all other forms of communications, to protect the people from unscrupulous business practices.

bitter_kold
|
January 08, 2011
I am sorry Jack. I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I think that the way the internet is at this moment is the way it should be. The police are currently patrol for child molesters and other such vermin.

I wasn't meaning that "law abiding" citizens should monitor the internet. I don't think that any government has the right to control what is being said and done as long as it doesn't hurt innocent kids or violates the rights that our constitution currently provides us.

I, for one, would like to know what made someone in the FCC feel that the traffic on the internet needs to be controlled in the first place.
DrPepperPHD
|
January 07, 2011
Hey bitter_kold…I agree with you about there being some risk involved with putting Obama’s birth Certificate out on the web (it may prove Obama is a fraud), however, all things considered, I believe it is worth the risk. You may have heard the protester during the reading of the Constitution in the House. When it got to the part about the president must be a natural born American, a lady called out “except for Obama.” The lady that did that showed courage and verve! Anderson Cooper 360 made fun of her, but in my mind I asked Anderson what that snake oil salesman has to hide. The people asking questions are a sizeable portion of the United States. Good people have lost careers over this. Why do YOU think he is hiding the long form? We must use the proper word “hide.” Even Abercrombie, or whatever the guy’s name is that said he was at Obama’s birth, never gave the doctor’s name – I think the guy is also a known liar!

Why is this not getting out? Because it would create a national crises! So many questions about Obama like: does he have a social security number issued from Connecticut?

Here is the sad truth; the liberals are tired of this guy. They know he is WAY over his head, but they don’t want to admit it! As long as he stays on permanent vacation, he can’t mess things up as much. By next year, Obama will announce he will be a one term president opening the doors for other Democrats to compete. Pray that we don’t get into a situation with Korea or Russia or China that requires a leader!

jack_4ral
|
January 06, 2011
bitter I agree with you, but who should be in charge of the internet, a government of We The People or Fox News and the Republican Party?

Who are the law abiding persons you refer to?

bitter_kold
|
January 06, 2011
All the demanding of the President's long-form birth certificate is asking for something that could potentially be a threat to national security. Do you really want there to be enough information out on the WORLD WIDE WEB for some terrorist to be able to steal the identity of one of the most powerful leaders in the world? There are programs that are available to the public that can successfully guess social security numbers and who knows what else about a person just by using the information that can be found on a birth certificate. What damage can be done in the form of cyber terrorism with enough personal information regarding the President? Keep in mind that some terrorists are not the imbeciles that some media outlets would have you to believe. I am sure that there is a computer genius in China, Korea, or somewhere in the Middle-East that would love to get enough information to launch a wide scale cyber attack on our government's or military's computer systems.

However, I do fear that putting the government in control of the internet is a bad thing. I think it opens a lot of doors for someone to abuse our rights to free speech. I think that monitoring the internet for cyber predators is a good thing, but to be able to control what is the average, law abiding person does on the internet is treacherous ground for a government entity to tread upon.
jack_4ral
|
January 05, 2011
bones, no forgiveness is necessary in this case.

Comments can be misconstrued in a blind blog.

I enjoy reading your letters to the editor, it gives me conservative raw meat to chew on.

I try not to attack the person, but to attack the message that I beleive is wrong.

Again, say hi to Chris for me, you are lucky to be an associate with this young man.

callowaymine
|
January 05, 2011
You pulled those numbers out of your imagination. Obama's favorite rock album is Permanent Vacation by Aerosmith. Too bad he can't find time between hoops and golf to create a job.

As for Bush, during his years we had less than 5% unemployment rate; record low interest rates, and no inflation. If that is a depression, please, God, send us a depression.

Barack BOOHOOver Obama, your guy, has had 2 full years and STILL has a 10% unemployment rate. That is twice as high as 5%.

Barack BOOHOOver Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm.
Leebones
|
January 05, 2011
Jack_4ral I just learned this morning who you are and who the Chris was you were referring to. Please forgive me. I was wrong. I pray you do not hold it against me. No doubt I am overly sensititve when it comes to my family. Fact is, the lady from Henlawson made it a regular item in her comments to attack my un-wed daughter. So, my hackles get up when I think someone is attacking them. At any rate, again, please forgive me, I was wrong in my conclusion of who the Chris was you were referring to. Thanks for reading and commenting on my articles.
jack_4ral
|
January 04, 2011
callo, again with the 180 degree rule.

Again you turn the facts around like a true conservative.

President Obama taking all that vacation time.

In 4 years Carter took 79 days.

In 4 years Bush Sr took 543 days.

In 8 years Reagan took 436 days.

In 8 years Bush Jr was known as the vacation President and the war time president that was missing in action.

In 8 years Bush Jr took 977 days, I beleive that is approx. 3 years in 8 years.

In 2 years Obama has took 26 days.

I have to say that Bush Jr did do something, he put this Nation into the worst recession/depression since Hoover.

Give us a break.
jack_4ral
|
January 04, 2011
bones, you are a person that exhibit a classic case of paranoid schizophrenia, I would suspect that you hear little voices in you head.

I don't know you or your family, and I don't want to either, I don't like being around dysfunctional people that are lacky's for the coal industry.

Relative to internal striff in the family unit, welcome to the real world, we all have to face how it really is in life, get over it.

It seems that you have a chip on your shoulder and a monkey on your back. If you continue to carry this unnecessary burden, it will cause you undue stress and health problems in the future.

"Say hello to Chris for me." To me, this is an innocent remark, not a slur that would cause you personal anguish.

The Chris that I was referring to works in the same office that you do, a fine young man that I hold in high asteme.

Jack_4ral does not lie, attack a person's family, or even the person, but the eschewed comments that they write for facts.

Say Hi to Chris for me.

callowaymine
|
January 04, 2011
Of course, Lee, anyone reading Jack's posts realizes he has no logic, rationality, or coherency. He can barely spell. Liberals cannot debate conservatives; they have to lie about their selves and intentions to be elected, or, mostly they just call names. I have said before, time to throw the kids out and bring the adults back into power.

Dewister, good comedy. How many vacations did the 20 million unemployed get this year, jobless after 2 full years of this do-less, clueless buffoon, Barack BOOHOOver Obama, whose strong point is to whine and dine on the taxpayer dime? How many vacations? A dozen? Obama the hoop shooter; Obama the golfer; Obama the world traveler, etc...everything except, Obama the job creator.

Credit card reform saved us from a depression? Hee haw! That's great. 2 females to the Supreme Court? Big Whoop! Regained world respect? Pardon me, when and from whom? North Korea? Iran? China?

Obama is the problem. Nobody that loves the country should work with him. The only cooperation he is due is IF he moves in the right direction. I am a proud member of the party of "He** No!!" when it comes to Barack BOOHOOver Obama and his agenda.

Again, under Bush, as late as late 2006, early 2007, with republican House and Senate; we had: 5% unemployment rate; record low interest rates, and no inflation. Nancy, Barney, and Nick took over in 2007; by 2008 we were going into the tank, and I will never forget when it became painfully obvious that millions of dupes were going to elect a Marxist president three quarters of a million jobs were lost, Sept. 2008 going into Oct. 2008.

Fact is fact, numbers don't lie. The coup de grace is, Barack BOOHOOver Obama has had 2 years to do something, anything with our economy, he has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. We are still stuck on 10% jobless. That is your guy, you are to blame.

Lets start by overturning Obamacare.
Leebones
|
January 04, 2011
Folks, jack_4ral is a clear illustration of the way liberals debate. In his first comment he ends it with "Say hi to Chris for me". This is an inside "dig" at me. The Chris he is referring to is the father of my un-wed daughter's child. So, ole Jack here is trying to hurt me personally by making mention of Chris because he knows I never cared for the guy. Now can any of you tell me what that inference has to do with anything I've written about? Obviously it has nothing to do with my subject nor my principles. It is simply a lame attmept by an ill informed liberal lackey to try and anger me. Isn't it sad how these weak people behave?
Leebones
|
January 04, 2011
Dewister: From your rhetoric I presume you work for the DNC or for Senator Rockefeller. If you sincerely believe the Federal Government is going to SAVE money over the next ten years, I'd like to invite you to name me even ONE such prediction by the government that has come to fruition. Come on, give me one! Social Security ... broke. Medicare ... broke. Welfare ... broke. This is because it is NOT the fundamental duty of government to create social reform. The fundamental role of government is to protect the freedoms granted us by the constitution so that we the people can form our own society apart from government coercion. It’s sort of like the difference between protecting your children and allowing them to discover success for themselves verses dominating their lives and attempting to make all their decisions for them. No thank you. I don't want a Nanny-state. I'll take freedom any day. As to Rush, ... deal with it. The ONLY reason he is so listened to and loved is because he is right! By the way, how is Tom Daschle’s radio show going? Oh, that's right; he went off the air because he couldn't get more than 50 people to listen to his socialist drivel. Too bad.
dewister
|
January 03, 2011
Our Commander-in-Chief and his family took a much deserved vacation. We must[if we are fair] give him much credit for staving off another Great Depression. Credit card reform,increased funding for our veterans.Lower taxes resulting in more take home pay,appointing two females to The Supreme Court. Joining other major world powers in signing new civil rights for those who are of would fight for our country. Regained respect from world leaders that was left in shambles by the previous president. These are but a few of his accomplishments. With little or no help from those Republicans.

This nation was a mess when our country installed Obama as president. It will take a lot of hard work and strong leadership to right this great nation. Rather than bite an extended hand the Republican/Tea Party should work with our president to solve the problems facing this nation. Republicans are the party of me, the Democrats are the party of we. Right now we need the party of WE.
jack_4ral
|
January 03, 2011
class,

Then you are saying that conservative, republican, fascist and gary are for the people.

Give me a break.

McCain's birth certificate still says that he was born at the Colon hospital in the Republic of Panama. Live with it, he is not a native born citizen, as in a natural born citizen, if anything he was born a U.S. National.
classact140
|
January 02, 2011
Democrats like Obama and Rockefeller are not for the people , they are for themselves , and

Mr. Rockefeller prefers to ration freedoms to the rest of us , these kind of politicians need to lose and go home , or wherever they came from . For it is the real world that I live in nor want to live in , what is wrong with these people Gary . You seem to know what is wrong with this picture this administration is trying to push down our throat ... Thank God for people like you Gary , thank you for standing up and speaking the logical truth .... :)
DrPepperPHD
|
January 02, 2011
First of all…Jack…I told you where you could find a copy of John McCain’s birth certificate. Didn’t Martha say links could not be printed? It is a long form with all the pertinent details. John McCain’s parents were both American citizens; even if he were born on the moon, he would still be an American citizen in that case. Members of Congress looked into vetting McCain; but Obama was not vetted properly as per about 25% of the US population. Even your liberal buddies on MSNBC (Matthews and others) are now calling for Obama to do the right thing and release his “long form” birth certificate! What has been shown on the web is a certificate of live birth…and some question if it has been photo shopped. If you can provide me the name of Obama’s attending physician, I would be ever so thankful. In addition…McCain is now a moot point. He is not the president, and did not create the monstrosity called “Healthcare.” Furthermore, why is Obama so resistant to having his records reviewed? Aren’t you just a BIT curious? If he were a Republican, wouldn’t you want him show his records? Please give me the same rights you would give yourself or other liberals! All I want is the long form birth certificate printed on the web!

Gas getting a little high in your neck of the woods, Jack? Didn’t Obama promise he would allow exploration? The Democrats won’t allow exploration in the good promising areas. What callowine said about the fairness doctrine is nothing more than another power grab by the Democrats. Their logic can’t stand on its own in a competitive environment, so they try to regulate it to their advantage. America is going the way of the Roman Empire now; it is slowly dying from “bread and circuses” given to the people by the Democrat Party. If it weren’t for the “Tea Party”, I would give up hope completely. Within its ranks are true patriots; people who are more concerned about what they can give to the country than what the country can give to them. Sound to me you’re one of those “what the country can give to ME” people. Right now the nation is GIVING to Obama and family while they take ANOTHER extended vacation to Hawaii. Final word: Obama is a loser, and 2012 can’t come fast enough! People can see he is a fraud and a liar!

Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: